What are some of the more established cancer clinics in Europe?

If you are researching cancer treatments outside of the U.S. for yourself or a loved one, you may wish to explore your options by consulting with several cancer clinics in Europe. Receiving cancer treatments anywhere, and especially in another country, is a significant commitment of money and time. You may wish to begin your research process online, then engage in contact with individual clinics through email and telephone communication, and perhaps through in person site visits in advance of your final decision.

Cancer clinics in Europe may provide new treatment options to patients. The following list of clinics does not serve as an endorsement of all facilities listed.

Aeskulap Clinic
Brunnen, Switzerland
www.aeskulap.com

BioMed Clinic
Bad Bergzabern, Germany
www.biomed-klinik.de

Dove Clinic
Hants and London, England
www.doveclinic.com

Herzog Clinic
Hessen, Germany
www.fachklinikdrherzog.de

Hufeland Clinic
Bad Mergentheim, Germany
www.hufeland-klinik.de

Humlegaarden Cancer Clinic
Humlebaek, Denmark
www.humlegaarden.com

Institute of Warmth and Immune Therapy
Vienna, Austria
www.hyperthermie.at

Institute for Tumor Therapy
Duderstadt, Germany
www.immuntherapie.org

Leonardis Clinic
Bad Heilbrunn, Germany
www.leonardis-klinik.de

Lukas Clinic
Arlesheim, Switzerland
www.lukasklinik.ch

Mariposas Clinic
Malaga, Spain
www.mariposasclinic.com

Paracelsus Clinic
Lustmühle, Switzerland
www.paracelsus.ch

What are some important initial questions to ask when interviewing a cancer clinic?
The Interview Process: Initial Questions to Ask Cancer Clinics
1. What specific treatments do you recommend for me? What scientific evidence exists indicating efficacy with those treatments? What is the experimental nature of the treatments?
2. What is the safety profile and risks associated with those treatments? How do you define the ratio between the potential risks of treatments and the potential benefits?
3. How many patients have you treated with my diagnosis? In your experience with my diagnosis, what have you seen with time to response and specific types of response such as stable disease, partial remission, and complete remission? How long have those responses been sustained in patients?
4. Have you published your research results? If not, why?
5. How did you come to develop your treatment protocol? What discoveries throughout your career have informed your current regimen?
6. What is your definition of treatment success, and why?
7. What are some of the characteristics of patients that respond to your therapies?
8. How do you monitor patient progress and response rates over time? What tests would you recommend, and how often?
9. What follow up care do you recommend after patients finish initial treatments?
10. What is the estimated cost of my recommended treatments? What is the cost of follow up care?
11. How many staff members does your clinic employ? How many of them are medical doctors? How many of them are oncologists? How many of them speak English?
What is the Type C coping style and how can I learn more about it?

Maybe you’ve heard of Type A behavior that has been associated with heart disease. Type A behavior is generally self-centered, highly charged, competitive, and overflowing with anxiety, anger, and hostility.

A significant amount of research indicates that cancer patients exhibit Type C behavior, which is the polar opposite of Type A. Unfortunately, this isn’t new information. According to Cancer As A Turning Point (page 11), the clear link between cancer and the patient’s emotional life history were commonly accepted in medical circles up to the year 1900.

According to The Type C Connection (page 39), Type C behavior patterns display most or all of the following:

They are nonexpressors of anger. Often, they were unaware of any feelings of anger, past or present.
They tended not to experience or express other negative emotions, namely anxiety, fear, and sadness.
They were patient, unassertive, cooperative, and appeasing in work, social, and family relationships. They were compliant with external authorities.
They were overly concerned with meeting the needs of others, and insufficiently engaged in meeting their own needs. Often, they were self-sacrificing to an extreme.

Type C is considered more of a coping style than a personality since these individuals often developed their ways of being in the world as a survival strategy. Fortunately, coping styles evolve, and many individuals who are considered Type C learn new behaviors as they heal.

Interestingly, people often embody a variety of characteristics from throughout the coping continuum of Type A, to B, to C. The middle road position is Type B where the individual expresses anger and other emotions, meets their own needs first and also responds to that of others, and feels relaxed.

Excellent resources about the Type C coping style with strategies for healing include the following:

The Type C Connection: The Mind-Body Link to Cancer and Your Health by Lydia Temoshok, PhD, and Henry Dreher
Cancer As A Turning Point: A Handbook for People with Cancer, Their Families, and Health Professionals by Lawrence LeShan, PhD
The Book of Awakening by Mark Nepo
Cancer as a Turning Point conferences and other resources http://www.cancerasaturningpoint.org/
Healing Journeys free conferences and other resources http://www.healingjourneys.org/
What are some facts about healthcare in the United States?
Approximately 45.7 million Americans, or 15.3 percent of Americans, were uninsured in 2007. After steadily climbing for 6 years, the number of uninsured Americans dropped by more than one million compared to the previous year. The United States spends more on health care than other industrialized nations, and those countries provide health insurance to all their citizens. (U.S. Census, August, 2008)
In 2004, health care spending in the United States reached $1.9 trillion, and was projected to reach $2.9 trillion in 2009. (Health Affairs, February, 2006)
About a third of all health care spending nationwide pays for bureaucratic overhead. (Harvard Medical School)
In 2004, the United States spent 15.3 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care. It is projected that the percentage will reach 20 percent in the next decade. Health care spending accounted for 11.6 percent of the GDP in Switzerland, 10.9 percent in Germany, and 10.5 percent in France. (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2006)
The United States ranks far ahead of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 30 member countries in terms of total health spending per capita, with spending at 6,100 USD, more than twice the OECD average. In the United States, government revenues fund only 45 percent of health spending, which is well below the average of 73 percent in OECD countries. Private insurance account for 37 percent of total health spending in the United States, which is by far the largest share of OCED countries. (OECD, 2006)
The World Health Organization (WHO) ranked the United States health care system 37th of 190 countries, well below most of Europe, and trailing Chile and Costa Rica. The United States ranks 72nd in the WHO rankings of performance on level of health. (WHO)
The United States ranked among the bottom of industrialized countries on healthy life expectancy at age 60. Americans spend more years lived in poor health resulting from chronic illness or disability. (OECD, 2006)
Approximately 100,000 Americans die annually from medical errors. (Institute of Medicine, 1999).
Premiums for employer-based health insurance increased by 7.7 percent in 2006, which is the smallest increase in seven years. Premiums rose by over 9 percent each year between 2000 and 2005. All types of health plans, including health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations and point-of-service plans, showed this increase. Since 2000, employment-based health insurance premiums have increased 73 percent, compared to cumulative inflation of 14 percent and cumulative wage growth of 15 percent during the same period. (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, August, 2004
The average employee contribution to company-provided health insurance has increased more than 143 percent since 2000. Average out-of-pocket costs for deductibles, co-payments for medications, and co-insurance for physician and hospital visits rose 115 percent during the same period. (Institute of Medicine, 2004)
Millions of workers in the United States don't have the opportunity to get health insurance coverage. A third of firms in the United States did not offer coverage in 2004. Nearly two-fifths, or 38 percent, of all workers are employed in smaller businesses, where less than two-thirds of firms now offer health benefits to their employees. (Kaiser Family Foundation)
Do you have questions for Jeannine about health and healing resources for cancer?
   
© 2006 Jeannine Walston